Apologies, was genuinely meant to be 1906 as you'll see about my comments on his victory over Langford. On second thoughts though it was a pretty...
There are a lot of posts of yours that I don't agree with PP, however I like the way you keep your views so consistently in evey thread and don't...
1. Marciano - 1951 2. Johnson - 1904 3. Dempsey - 1919 4. Holyfield - 1988 5. Tunney - 1924 6. Langford - 1910 7. Patterson - 1956 8....
I'd very much doubt that. Without the knowledge we have today of Greb I can't see how many would have him above Tunney if he went 1-4 against him...
I'm pretty sure Jeffries was widely considered (in America anyway) as the greatest boxer ever. That status however went after the loss to Johnson.
Lewis' right uppercut?
The steel chair was always a personal favourite.
That's an incredibly weak argument. Wlad has a much better reign than Tyson has and arguably hit harder, with a better KO percentage. Not too...
Can't really see a case for Tim to take this one. He's a great fighter and probably in my top 5 favourite heavyweights, but I can't see anything...
Do you yourself believe that Bokaj, because if not you really are blinded by your idolisation of Ali.
Your wrong. There's no way someone can go throughout their whole career without, what ESB consider 'ducking'
Before he moved down, yes. Now I'm not so sure. I think Dawson's got a long road back from that ass whooping even if the weight was a big factor,...
Because they were human beings. They adapt to what they have to adapt to. If right now boxing became a 20 round sport, we'd see some gruelling...
Yer good post Baz, I've had similar replies to this over my time here at ESB, but I still think the fact he beat Frazier in just 2 rounds was just...
:deal love the metaphor bro
