Not really iconic but this one is pretty amusing: Norton looks like a ten year old kid begging is angry drunk father not to beat him with a belt....
"Stick around..." Someone by the name of "Galvatron" is certainly a prospect.
There's no direct evidence on this matter, because no one has ever conducted a study specifically designed to explore this question, but one can...
They may or may or not be significantly heavier, but they most assuredly would not be significantly taller. (it's amazing how many people are so...
Patterson should take this fairly easily. Contrary to popular misconception he hit quite hard. His weakness was his ability to take it, not dish...
Here's a question to ponder: Does 2002 Tyson lose as badly to his 1988 self as he did to Lewis? My guess is yes, probably so.
You mean aside from the fact that he did in fact overcome a fighter the same height and 20 lean pounds heavier than Lewis? There's probably no...
Norton is definitely not as good a fighter as Jack Johnson and by Norton's time (is that the rule set they're fighting under?) grappling was no...
Walcott may very well have hit harder than Holyfield and was craftier, though he almost certainly didn't have Holyfield's chin.
The actual fight was pretty close to what I considered the most likely scenario, but I have to admit I thought it was not exactly unlikely that...
I was a teenager, but I expected exactly what happened. (I don't consider myself particularly astute pr prescient for this.) Of course the real...
"Lewis would still stop him." Of course that's the most *probable* outcome, but no one has presented any reason that it is at all prima facie...
No, but he's damn close, and quite possibly the best of the last ~fifty years. The best of all time is probably Joe Gans or Benny Leonard.
errata: peer reviewed
No. Or anyway there is not the slightest prima facie reason to suppose he'd struggle any more in more in the current talent pool than he did...
