you may be right but i couldn't help myself. it was too well set up. but then again so are base judgments..and that is all you've done in your post.
guys - for all the good points you make you let yourselves down by labelling the points of views of others. if you cant get over that then you...
hope you pick your fruit better than you vocabulary
don't be patriotic and try to look at it clean :cool: calzaghe is only fighting jones now because he thinks he can win and it counts. it's...
maybe if he was roman as his name suggests....
aye. chop chop was a good gate keeper. not recently of course.
"would have, could have, should have. boxing is corrupt" is a lead in only to back up your point. thats all.
if you want to be taken serious use the FACT caps argument out of it. you won't see me doing it. i will back up everything i have to say...
you can't put calzaghe at number one when he's never beaten a top fighter in his prime *puff*
yeps. mosley lost out on the first fight with floyd because oscar was a bigger money-spinner and landed it (no surprise there). cotto is the...
i'm happy to hear what ulii or anyone else has to say actually. i'm just putting my point of view forward.
young oscar, mosley and tszyu were before his time......
is that in the same way that you won't tell us why he fell short? either say why you don't believe it or don't. you can't win an oscar here so...
thats true but same applies to gatti. both were punching bags.
it's fine by me but you still haen'øt put up your point of view
