"preppy-ass playboy type and fake" was the response i made. do you want to respond to that or something earlier? if you want to be obscure again...
not to the comment i made. it was a generalisation.
then respond to it if you don't agree.
true now after losing to joe. but everything to said above was joe's philosophy to the age of 35.
define that skill level based on the fighters you've seen him fight. this is an international forum so you shouldn't have any problem comparing...
it was just the "preppy-ass playboy-type.and fake" comment that got me. easy to label him that on face value imo.
i mean put yourself on the line or save your judgments for someone else. i'm just here to debate with people who disagree with me without trying...
me too in one sense. but thats life. just like you and me working to pay the rent.
i agree with you. but oscar still defines boxing on the world stage. even if that robs us of big fights sport remains a business so we all have...
but if you imply someone else does your own argument falls apart. don't do that.
yep. good references too. but that wasn't oscar's fault, was it?
if you really thought that you would leave the label off your opinion and be confident enough to take someone else's opinion straght up. you won't...
you're still young if that's the best you can do
true but.... boxing needs him because he puts boxng on the map *pauses for breath*
because hatton was bigger PPV. anyone would rather see cotto - floyd because cotto has presence,he'øs formidable and carries a bigger rep.
