agree also. top post scurla
i'd like to know how many non-brits voted for froch because i think people who believe that froch can conquer taylor are in for a serious wake-up...
above you wrote that hearns is one of the easier fights of his life. maybe you should proof read your posts because you just gave pavlik huge...
how can you call tito - mayorga a one-sided beating?
am i hearing you right? are you saying hearns is one of the easier fights pavlik would have?
but anyone can look that good - IF they are good enough - against sub-par opponents. and calzaghe has made a career out of it. looking good...
i agree with every word. a wasted talent.
nobody's going to get their wish. mogens palle will make sure kessler defends his bogus belt because that belt will be used as a negotiating tool...
considering few people knew who kelly pavlik was prior to miranda i'd say people are putting him in with some pretty esteemed company before it's...
the worst out of the bunch is diaz?? lockett was an obscure european not deserving of a shot and diaz was an underskilled but respected world...
it's going to be hard for people to not reference tyson as a benchmark for this thread. but i don't agree younger is necessarily better. tyson...
chin i'd go for oscar and hopkins i think. concussive power i'm not going to pick a fighter who hasn't done it against top class opposition -...
definitely pavlik - lockett because lockett was a whipping boy. the other 2 deserved to be in a ring with their opponents and earned their stripes...
way, way too premature! remember how judah was built up pre-tszyu? and now we all see him in a much different light.... pavlik fought nobody...
jones doesnt need to 'cement a legacy'. he's washed up and thats why joe is fighting him.
