i'm really surprised people think this can go 12
so analyze it instead of saying " its fun picking on joyboy"....
well it probably wasn't that simple but the mentality probably wasn't far off.
resume has to be defined on wins, losses and chances taken. this has been done before. resmune alone is water.
i'm with you on that.
which doesn't apply to other fighers because he got himself to the top. that makes it a double standard.
hopkins started slow but looked better later on. taylor might not be remembered as a top class fighter but he will at least will be remembered...
you could have saved yourself all that trouble by saying you were from texas........:happy
you could be right. nice to hear you speak english for a change :thumbsup
actually taylor deserves props for beating hopkins and being the man to beat him when he was champ. taylor's a solid fighter in all respects.
and still,you can't put yourself on the line and put forward an opinion...
do you fink that because hopkins did it against a smaller fighter, or do you fink that because of another reason?
do you fink so?
nothing is "fact" simply because you post it so. i'm telling you it doesn't apply to calzaghe and since it's "fact" in your eyes then you should...
he's bored but he'll be back. count on it.
