sounds reasonable
Good wins for Floyd but in my opinion hearns has the better to top wins in his record.Floyd has longevity and also depth in his record.So it is...
Benitez or Duran were not old.
The thing with monzon is he never looked that impressive on film to me.I guess there must be more to it
Another vote for Hearns on points
I rate Hagler higher.
your whole case is weak.also the fact that you rank the Castillo win above the Duran win makes one question your objectivity
I looked at the first 5 and disagree on 3 counts. To me: - Duran win ranks above Castillo II win (quite clearly so) - Hill win above Canelo -...
The most likely scenario is Floyd losing a lopsided decision.
Floyd was a defensive genius.If he fights defensively, Floyd will go the full 12 rounds.He is not going to stand and trade with Hearns. He will move
The fight was at a catchweight and Canelo was not in his prime.The Hill win is better in opinion. The Corrales win ranks higher than the Canelo...
canelo was not prime.he improved after the lesson Floyd gave him.Hill was prime.I have no doubt Prime Hill or a Hearns beat canelo decisively
No but look Hill was prime when Hearns fought him. Canelo was not by the Floyd fought him.
in general it is like a flu, so should be no problem
I favour Griffin on points.Then again judges have a love affair with Canelo, so you never know
