Summer of 1946, Walcott had a clear edge in common opponents over Mauriello 3-0 vs 2-4 and had defeated 3 different men who beat Mauriello...
Walcott in 1946 had already beaten 3 different men who beat Mauriello. How can you not grasp that?
Entering 1946 Common opponents Walcott 3-0 Mauriello 2-4 Walcott defeated 3 different men who beat Mauriello. Walcott should have been number 1
Mauriello creeped above Bivins entering 1946 despite Bivins beating him twice and Bivins not losing for four straight years? I call BS!!! Nba...
Beating woodcock was good but he had recently lost too two men Baksi and Oma whom Walcott has beaten. Walcott defeated nba number 2 Bivins who...
The nba had it right mauriello was only 4th The New York ring had their golden boy at 1
The best on paper was Walcott and Bivins Walcott Held 3 victories over men mauriello lost too!!!! These were recent losses to . Mauriello lost to...
I just posted significant facts Going into 1946... Walcott had 3 wins over men who beat mauriello Bivins has two victories over mauriello plus...
You are taking the New York RING rankings where Maureillo was from And not the NBA ratings which had mauriello rated much lower during those...
You know it’s funny, These top black contenders who never got title shots Harry Wills, George Godfrey, Sam Langford, Elmer Ray, Lem Franklin,...
Yeah not good enough for 1 over those guys . Just read the records
Of the men I brought up Henry- top 5 rated 1950-1952 Baker- cracked the top 5 1950-1952 Louis- top 5 rated 1950-1951 Charles- top rated...
Al Weill turned down a fight with Clarence Henry in 1952 for the number 1 rating in the world to the winner. Instead he took on 36 year old Lee...
Clarence Henry knocks out bob baker in spectacular fashion in Madison square Garden then destroys satterfield in 1. Title shot? Nope instead...
Charles Walcott Baker and Henry were all top 5 rated in the world 1950-1952. Louis was top 5 1950-1951 and he beat Brion far worse than lastarza...
