Agreed :good
He would lose to Ali,Foreman,Frazier and Holmes - definitely. I'm obviously talking about the best versions of the first three in that decade....
Most probably your scenario. Holmes would have to box very carefully early on because if Foreman catches him full on,he would follow up pretty...
Calzaghe would comfortably outbox Froch. Would go the distance,though.
A good many of them were pretty decent fighters all things considered. Even though none were top notch in all time great lists,Tyson was a pretty...
There was always one school of thought that gave hope for Muhammad,though - Most conceded that Ali would last longer than Frazier,Roman and Norton...
Muhammad was a 3-1 underdog. Very much a LIVE one but an underdog,nonetheless.
No doubt the same conspiracy theorists who hollered "Fix" would claim that the moon landing was faked.
Yes,indeed Liston would have been stopped at some point during that bout,anyhow. It's long been established that the count had been *****ed up,so...
Good matchup. The main supporting bout could be Charlie Magri v Bob Foster
Exactly as I have it with both fights.
9 - 6 Frazier. Joe wins by four points as he got two in the fifteenth.
Top 15 - Definitely.
On a H2H basis,I'd take the Leonard of the first Hearns fight over any welter in history apart from the original Sugar.
And full marks to Muhammad for taking on Quarry and Bonavena after all that time out. No soft touches for HIM !
