:deal not to mention Audley will KO Fury of Tyson can sum up the courage to face him
Russell isn't going to win his next 15 fights by KO and will have moved up in weight by then. Frampton will be a between a solid contender and a...
:deal I think that's what the whole forum uses it for tbh. Anyone with a decent boxing brain knows there list is absolutely dreadful and could...
Common now bro, Holmes absaloutley schooled Berbick.
Tommy Hearns. Although out of that list you could make an argument for everyone of them, but I picked Tito by accident instead of the Kbros. If...
I'd probably take most of the CW division top 10 over Langford if he was fighting anywhere between 150-180.
I'd argue Holmes has a better resume, in some ways similar, but with more longevity. Although Holmes didn't tear through his opposition like Tyson...
Well done for pointing out the obvious :tong. Sometimes their point system works, but more often than not it leads to some ridiculous rankings.
Klitschkos are too high (Vitali mainly). Bradley is fine above PAC, along as PAC is above Marquez. If marquez was above PAC, I'd accept Bradley...
Well I'm probably not the best to tell you but he was a real aggressive fighter, with A+ stamina, quick hands and feet. His chin was about as good...
Yer this, although I think I accidentally voted for Langford :patsch
I was expecting you to pop up sooner or later :tong Tommy had the tools to beat every WW there ever was, I don't think there's any denying...
I think that there's no doubt that it effects Ali's resume more than Foreman's, but being arguably one of the greatest wins of all time may drop...
Surely Foreman against Moorer would rank incredibly high in your eyes as well then?
How has no one mentioned Leonard Vs Hagler yet?