Trout looks very sharp.
Agreed. Fighting 2x a year, at least until he's 35, I'd imagine. Perhaps beyond. Maybe a year here and there with only 1 fight.
I think he's better off diving right in, if he's going to do it. I was amazed how sharp he looked against Peter, and thought the time away did him...
I agree with this, although I'm not exactly sure how long his speed would adequately keep him away.
I wouldn't favor him against either of them at this point. But stranger things have happened, and Joshua and Wilder are still both largely works...
I have no idea what would have happened, but I would have loved to have seen it. :smoking:
Apparently so! :lol:
This thread is silly. Golovkin and Crawford are both widely criticized. Some of it is warranted, some of it isn't, and this applies to both of...
In my opinion, Holyfield's last solid effort was the Lewis rematch, but he was clearly on the slide for awhile at that point. From a legacy...
Fair enough. I'd probably estimate having him around #25 myself. Just curious, where would you have him, and who would you have 100% ahead of him.
An argument can be made, but I definitely don't think he was the best ever. But history might be kinder to Floyd than his contemporaries realize....
I'd be surprised if GGG even has 16 more fights. :smoking:
Archie Moore. :smoking:
He probably doesn't. He lost his 2 biggest fights as well. But all that said, I think he is a shoe-in.
I think it will probably be that as well. I'm not sure if Hatton should make it over Calderon, but Hatton is fairly popular in them parts. Or at...
