You addressed everything except the speed factor. Leonard was faster with both hands and feet than Whitaker, and was more mobile, even though you...
I'll reply in a while.
If you knew anything about Pep you'd also know that rumour is false.
Because Robinson was bigger - naturally bigger.
They were? Who told you this? Oh yea, Boxrec :oops:
Although to be fair, Calzaghe did show a lot of heart beating the dreaded Evans 'African Warrior' Ashira with just one hand.
He was fighting every five minutes, of course he's going to lose some rounds. He wasn't on a two-fights-a-year schedule like Calzaghe, who gets as...
That speaks better of Pep than it does for Robinson, then.
Of course - he was much taller and had a stronger frame.
You talk about workrate - Whitaker's higher output would not necessarily bode well for him. It means he would be more stationary and offering...
Guns are illegal in boxing, didn't you know?
Well I suppose you're right. Pep never had much substance, he could only manage a streak of 135-1-1.
Not by only natural punchers. LaMotta, Greb, Hamsho, these men were aggressive but far from dynamite.
Because he was a ring deity.
To be honest I think you're complicating things far too much.