That Greb has the better resume is beyond argument. His 1919 alone is mind-boggling... and his overall career-resume is probably (maybe even...
Whatever gives you that idea? The thing is that Klompton has done more research, and knows more about the period in question, than all the...
Always good to hear a well-balanced, unbiased opinion from someone who really knows, what he's talking about!
I have a hard time picturing C*ckell having much of a chance against Bruno!
Yeah, I saw that fight too. That is one tough Frenchman!
Kessler is retired, and will not fight again. If he did, and Degale was his opponent - the Dane would be badly outboxed, and possibly stopped for...
I don't think it's an odd choice at all! All those seasoned reporters who took part in the 1950 poll would have been young men when Dempsey was in...
Terry McGovern?
I was about to say the same thing!
I think Colin Hart and the rest of you guys are being too hard on the great masters from the 19th century! Take a look at the all-time top 5...
You're right... how could I overlook him? Chavez, 37 Hopkins, 33 Narváez, 31 Hill, 29 DLH, 29 Louis, 27 Michalczewski, 27 Wladimir, 27
All his rankings (every division + p4p) are EXACTLY the same as Tracy Callis' all-time lists!
Chavez, 37 Hopkins, 33 Narváez, 31 Hill, 29 Louis, 27 Michalczewski, 27 Wladimir, 27
I don't see Leo Houck on the list, though he has actually beaten 7 of your original 30 men: McCoy Wilson Chip (x4) Dillon McGoorty Papke...
Dave Sands???
