only because of hopkins' age. this fight 8 years ago would have been much more interesting.
super middles and light heavies are both in need of quality fighters. so i have no doubt taylor can cut it with either.
but he held a 'recognised belt'. do you think danny williams, michael sprott or 'you know who' could offer more resistance? ddin't think so...
maybe you can clean it up..champ?
since you're British and with that mindset i imagine you'd be a prime candidate for frank warren's crew.
but..kessler isn't as set in stone in the US as taylor is. the calzaghe fight was, literally, make or break, for two fighters who had never tested...
aye. this is how i think too.
yep. better way of putting it.
To be a great fighter you have to beat great fighters. we can all agree on that. but in the present day that is less likely to happen. big money...
actually i don't think it's about 'will'. more about the next payday.
maybe but you also can't generalise a fighter by his win or KO ratio - which is what you're doing. joe calzaghe is undefeated, a bonefide...
agreed to a point but holding his station at the top of the heap isn't as a secure as people think if he doesn't play it right. i know it's...
maybe you're right on that. maybe wlad is over careful.
if you were objective you wouldn't be labelling people who disagree with you and you'd be telling us what and why you disagree with it. can you do...
read my response to your last post then tell me what you disagree with.
