you're right about this but this is how the world works and those in it know that.
that's fine. it's your choice if you have an opinion or not.
i don't either. but how much more interesting and legitimate would it have been 8 years ago? also, regardless of hatton's performance look at...
then why are you quoting me now to avoid confrontation?
i'm not trying to get nasty. i'm 'daring' you to read my original post and react to it.
the issue isn't money - it's respect. and because joe wanted to call out both jones and hopkins at that time - well that's why he cheapens him...
i'll take you up on that gladly. and i do believe calzaghe will look to seize his moment. doesnøt mean he will, that will largely depend on...
well i was born in '67 which makes me 40 years old now. it also means i can relate to hopkins' plight as a former boxer.
read my post again. it's not 'common knowledge', it's just what you're basing your argument on. read my post, tell me why i'm wrong and i'll...
you're right that hatton had more to pick and choose from. his weight range and relevant divisions were a lot healthier than calaghe's were. but...
well fighters will be remembered for who they fought and when because there is a better record of it. it's only a naaive point of view that judges...
that's right. hopkins is the itch he could never scratch because..he could never get hopkins to fight him when it really mattered
good post but it goes beyond that. calzaghe wasn't ducked because a belt alone doesn't entitle you to that much. like i said before you need...
thankyou. but i'll reitterate what i said before. i'm not posting to preach and i'm more than happy to lock horns with anyone who disagrees -...
tarver will be living off his jones win for the rest of his life... he was in the right place at the right time but no-one will remember him, will...
