Again, Who had the better heavyweight career Mauriello or Ray? Your answer awaits Charles was a heavyweight champion, so rays win over him...
Keep avoiding the question...who was better Ray or Mauriello? Let’s hear your answer. Mauriello was only 23 years old when he was defeated twice...
The question is who was a better heavyweight Mauriello or Ray My answer is Ray. Is your Mariello? If it is you’re going to have a tough time...
Whose side are you on here? In our top 50 heavyweights of all time list, we had ray in the top 10 and you argued for a while why Mauriello...
It was a fair decision The United Press scorecard had it 5-4-1 for Ray, while the Associated Press card scored the match 5-4-1 for Charles. Here...
Lesnevich an average light heavyweight champion, defeated Tami four times! Even when tami was in his heavyweight peak days! Care to comment on...
Ray was ranked number 1 in 1947 after he beat prime versions of Charles and Walcott How would mauriello have done against Charles and Walcott?...
Great video but it’s a shame some of the top black murders row like Elmer Ray, Lee Q Murray, Lem Franklin, and Jimmy Bivins were left off.
Found this "None of the near-name heavies wants any part of Elmer Ray, who in a New Orleans battle royal knocked out nine opponents with one...
thoughts I’m going with Ray all the way
This is chokelab type logic, but I’ll bite. Walcott and Charles were rated number 1 and 2 in the world when Ray beat them Also Tami Mauriello...
Mauriello weighed 197 and 201 when he lost to lesnevhich in 1947 Sounds like a fully fledged heavyweight to me
No. He had a spotty record, he lost often. He was far from dominating in his prime. Decent contender in a weak era, but not one of the...
Well now your selling ray a bit short here. He could really hit. He left a very durable Lee Savold out cold in 2 rounds. Marciano hammered away...
I don’t know. Both were clown shows. Carnera couldn’t crack an egg and couldn’t take a punch. Simon could hit, but he was so uncoordinated and...
