I just posted a top 10, but yours look good too.
1. Kessler 2. Hopkins 3. Eubank 4. Jones 5. Reid 6. Lacy 7. Mitchell 8. Brewer 9. Bika 10. Veit
Cotto isn't above Hopkins of course. Pavlik has at least as much place in top 10 as Cotto has. Hatton out.
If he really is extremely basic, then surely Taylor (who beat Hopkins etc.) should easily be able to beat Kessler, right? And Pavlik who has...
I have Bute as less stable in his performances than KEssler, but his peak level I believe is really high. He imo is one of the best technical...
Eubank went from underrated, to vastly overrated on here. Hard to know exactly why we are seeing this these days. I have an idea that Americans...
His top 5 was Calzaghe, Hopkins, RJJ (before the Calzaghe fight), Taylor and Bute. All legends except Bute who is a good champion whpo has had...
I can see you are londoner. I am also not American. Usually Americans tend to underestimate European fighters, but in this thread we have...
He was fine.
In the combo of speed and power p4p noone comes close to Tyson.
I actually think Calzaghe would be a good promoter.
I had it even. At the time however, I gave it to Roy because I was excited that he may have a great fight in front of him. A great moment in time....
Its copied and it is a rubbish list.
Wake up dude. The thread is about Dawson as opponent for Calzaghe, not for Kessler. :patsch
He is. He is just not as physically tall, big, long as Dawson. Neither is Hopkins or Roy. Therefore Dawson is a new proposition for Joe.
