I forget what a "Super Heavyweight" is supposed to be exactly, size and weight wise, the accepted parameters, but I'd expect Holmes to beat all of...
I think you're confusing Frank Bruno with someone else. George Foreman perhaps ?
Bruno would do better than Seldon. That's the best I can say about his chances here.
Ike would kill him.
Terrell wins by late stoppage. Bruno isn't a 15 round fighter. He didn't make the 10 rounds with Smith, went out in 11 against Witherspoon in his...
Yeah, the phantom punch comment was silly. Perhaps not 100% serious ?
No. I'd favour Liston. No. I'd favour Liston. No. He had an awesome right hand though. I don't have a list of "best right hands in HW...
And the idea that Johansson was at his best or even close to it against Brian London has simply never been proposed before, as far as I know. It's...
You say he was "essentially KO'd by Brian London" .... but he wasn't. Not under either of the two generally accepted definitions of "knocked...
Which points don't you like ? I honestly don't see much wrong with it. He thinks Ingo a slight favourite if it happens in 1958-'59 because Ingo...
I think Bruno would be the one eating jabs here.
In other words, he went the distance and finished the fight on his feet. And, yes, performing badly against Brian London so disgusted him,...
It's hard to evaluate Hearns as a middleweight, since he jumped around the divisions at bit. He lost to Barkley but he beat Shuler and Roldan...
10 rounder. Let's say, instead of Bruno facing Witherspoon and Frazier facing Tyson, they faced in each other. Marvis was coming off a decision...
Bruno was an amateurish clincher at best. Also, he was just too slow to avoid Tyson's blows for long, even with all his wrestling nonsense.
