You really aren't good at this. By saying Wlad was superior because he "let" Vitali have one belt, you implied Wlad would be Vitali h2h....
Fair. The ranking is defensible and that's the kind of criticism he deserves.
I respect your opinion, PugSp, but Spilzka was really the first guy he ever really struggled with, except maybe Sconiers. Jennings struggled with...
:good100% agree. Povetkin deserves a slightly higher ranking and deserves to be favored in their match, but I'm gonna go with Wilder to win.
I know its not h2h, moron, by saying Wlad "let" his brother have one title, you made it about h2h, which is what I was referring too. You really...
Nomymoron, I've already proven that definitively wrong. You can put a metric on all this. Vitali's defenses were about 60% in number of Wlad's...
Sure, poll it, most would say VK beats WK h2h, which is what your implication runs counter to. But that is meaningless, this thread isn't about...
You've backed up exactly 0% of what you said. Answer my last question numbnts.
I agree. The question, then, is by what metric do you give the lineal title to Wlad and not Vitali. (Long pause). Oh, you didn't think that...
And now your journey through trolldom is complete. Congrats!
Your stupidity is overwhelming. Think this through with me idiot. You say Wlad is lineal champ because of his win over Chagaev. Why is that?...
Only in your warped little mind, nomyson.
Too bad cw is irrelevant to this thread then, moron.
Actually, by that standard, VK was lineal. That is a Ring generated standard (#1 ring ranked v #2), and #1 VK beat #2 Sanders, and was Ring...
Your lying. Or stupid. Haye never had the "actual" hw title.
