He's a horrible person, he's **** but thinks he's on the same level as Mayweather or Pac, done lots of good chicken dances, etc.
I read someone say somewhere, possibly here, Broner is an offensive fighter who thinks he's a defensive fighter, I think that's true....
Doesn't get old.
Monzon absolutely no question!
Quite hard to choose but...the forum is a bit harsh on Fullmer considering his accomplishments
Liston would destroy Frazier like Foreman did. I hate how everyone reckons these modern giants would beat all the historically great heavyweights...
Just look at his nickname 'money'. His career and legacy and character can be summed up right there.
He's not thought of as a top 10 or 25 by any sensible person now, how would it get better by 2050?
Great post
No. Kim was an excellent fighter and apart from Mancini there weren't that many around at that time who would have stopped him.
I think Kim could've dominated the division quite plausibly. He was a beast and Mancini showed a hell of a chin and heart to take what Kim threw...
Duran by a couple or few places, for me. If they're not reasonably close on your atg list then you should have another look at it.
No. It isn't
Jones...
GGG robbed, and old GGG v prime ginge, pretty clear who the better fighter is.
