A fight between a proven great fighter against a fighter that only looks great because of the weakness of the competition he's facing . Give me...
# 1 Dempsey #2 Ali ( Only the 70's version) #3 Louis #4 Sullivan #5 Tyson # 6 Johnson ( Who was actually hated by the vast majority of the people...
Love Trinidad, but Ray Robinson is simply all wrong for him. That upright stance, lack of great head movement , and average chin would end up...
"Lightning " Lonnie was fast. But not quite as fast as those two.
Personally, I believe Pryor is the one to beat him. Pryor hit like a mule kicks, power in both hands, had great endurance, was very quick of...
I don't believe Trout beats the best of Davey Moore, much less the best of Duràn at Jr. Middleweight.
1 st favorite Ray Leonard. Current favorite, for what the sport is today, T. Crawford. All time favorites, many. Leonard, Ali, Duran, Davis...
Love Charles, but against Liston, prime vs prime he'd only prolong the inevitable. Liston would be to strong, too skilled, and too vicious for...
I don't believe it's that close at all. Holyfield was a much better fighter than Usyk is, especially before he started packing on all that extra...
Of course Lalonde was bigger. But Leonard wasn't badly hurt by him when he was knocked down, he was off balance, Lalonde actually landed better,...
If Leonard fought as much as Robinson did he would've had an easier time with Lalonde too, he was just as talented. Robinson stops Lalonde in...
I see some history revisionism dropped. Leonard was an consummate pro. He would've fought Hagler as early 1982 if he didn't have the eye injury....
Not many, personally my 1st criteria would be fighters that were defensively special, with great head and foot speed. That's B.Leonard, F.Welsh...
Think about it , David slayed only one Goliath. Ali slayed two.
When he would've been in his physical prime as a boxer, 1981-85. Or Without the eye injury or drugs.
