Ok, I was making assumptions you knew what I meant. What I was trying to say that a fighter with the ability to beat the most people is the better...
Ok I see what you're laughing at now. I misinterpreted. Yes it is very hypothetical.
You laugh - wrongly - but that is a lot easier to substantiate given it is down to skills :patsch
No. Thats your opinion. I'd say a brilliantly skilled fighter is a greater fighter than a fighter who earnt more and beat better opposition. It...
Its hard to, not it isn't.
We are going round in circle as everything here is going to be more or less subjective. Unless you want to take days analysing facts.
No. Otherwise he would've asked 'Which fighter had the greater career' because when you look at who they fought and who they beat you have to look...
Its just hard to accurately substantiate in the head, not dumb.
'That doesn't matter' bit on my other comment is in relation to you talking about a 105 Calzaghe fighting in the 105 division at the same time as...
* Because styles are based on skill set and overcoming a bad stylistic match-up is based on ability/skills. ** No he didnt, hence why nobody can...
Marquez would need to get titles at 140 and 147 and he is what 37 now. Not gonna happen. Rigondeaux is 30 and has not even won a proper title...
That doesn't matter one bit and you're avoiding my question just to suit yourself, just like you (and others, me included) could be accused of...
Look at it this way, if Lopez had the same skills but was the same size as Calzaghe - same height, reach, weight - who would win?
We have all manipulated the question, me included, not so much to my benefit as p4p is completely subjective and the ratio between skills, resume...
p4p. Skills > Resume
