...... Based on last night. As you said, it isn't scientific. It's sport, there are many variables. Hindsight is easy.
I think it's entirely possible that Jacobs could give GGG a few problems, and would be the most well rounded fighter on GGG's resume. But having...
Yet, Lemieux was exposed on more than one occasion, and vs far lesser fighters, but he gets your stamp of approval? Murray, much as I like...
Resumes don't win fights. I like Jacobs, but based on the eye test, GGG is on a different level.
A titlist or the champ? Didn't he lose to Sam Soliman around the same time?
My point isn't that Quillin was some kind of elite fighter. He was a world class mw. Before Canelo, he was the guy that was the consensus guy...
Who was Sturm at that point? Hadn't he had a bunch of losses and hiding out in Germany at that point?
The guy had already proved his level. You are basing your opinion completely on hindsight? There's no chance that Jacobs is pretty good and...
Eh, I think it far more likely that Jacobs refuses the fight as opposed to the other way around.
It's not a crime I need to prove. Are you calling it straight? Come on, really? It's a great if GGG does it, but since it wasn't it's not so good?...
Neither guy was ever considered THE GUY at any point that GGG needed on his resume. They were consolation prizes, 2nd choices after Quillin....
The problem is that is self-serving.
And what is the argument that Lemiuex and Murray are better wins?
Let's hope not. It is possible.
Don't be ridiculous.
