Didn't this whole thing start from you calling Usyk a bum for winning?
Of course he was not a bum. But this is my point, No one is infallible. No one is better than anyone else. Times change, and that's that.
Lennox Lewis who ran from Mike Tyson til he was completely finished, even I would've knocked him out then. Lewis was a great fighter but he waited...
That's just pure bollocks man come on.
Come on man, you're better than that surely? Remember when Lewis was flattened by McCall and Rahman? Why does he get a pass? Usyk hasn't even lost...
Of course Lewis ans Holyfield are not bums. The rest of your post is hypothetical. Lewis and Holyfield were knocked out by bums.
Not really sure what your point is to be honest. Usyk has gone to war with more tough challengers than Ali ever did. And he is basically a...
Are we talking about the same guy who Mike Tyson obliterated?
Compared to what?
Of course they weren't trash, my point is, boxing evolves. The fighters of the past displayed grit and courage beyond what we see mostly today but...
And Rico is not a top win for Usyk. This is my point. Usyk has looked consistently better than Ali ever did.
A record which consisted of what you would call today 'bums'. Come on, you must realise your hypocrisy?
But who had these so called great beaten prior to this? A string of bums. It was easy pickings back then.
But his supposed groundbreaking victories did. Same reason AJ got KOd by the marshmallow. This is my precise point. No one is infallible.
But my point is, who did they beat to be rated as such? A string of bums. This is why I say boxing evolves. What made them great to begin with?...
