as I said earlier, all weve got is the resume and the performances. Its impossible to say mathematically who delivers more force in the moment....
You speak of science so I ask you, apart from heresay i.e ' one or two testimonies from rare common oppnents who's comments are a) not necessarily...
cant be because weve got different results, how do you measure it?
Please tell me how youre measuring it.
its not fair to say : 'Tyson not a heavy hitter its all speed. hearns not a heavy hitter its all leverage. hamed not a heavy puncher its all...
definitely up there, in terms of being a knockout specialist, in his prime there weren't many better at it
yeah two of the biggest hitters of the day but neither seemed too interested in using it.
Yeah good one Chavez had great footwork, ruthless, precise, varied, great balance, id add mike Tyson too who pulled off some audacious footwork...
Have to agree, hagler wasn't nearly the same monster by the time leonard got to him. Whilst leonard had aged too he was still only 30 and had...
Good example, how did this one fail to deliver? had the potential to be so much more
Yeah what a disappointment that one was. how could foreman vs morrisson fail to be exciting? but it was.
When you put dynamite and fire together you expect a violent reaction. Which fights were cant miss don't blink matchups which didn't deliver when...
that's a different question
Not an astute assessment of Jackson.
foreman didn't push nearly as much vs ron lyle for example because lyle was hooking over his outstretched arms and was able to hurt foreman....
