Nice list ironchamp, that's what I'm talking about. To point out what impressed you the most in particular fighters career.
Look at Sheppard's record it's a spiders web weaved from W and L. 185 lb is 10 lbs over LHW limit - 4,5 kg. I would call it a borederline but you...
I saw ony 9 minute highlight of this fight and it looked very competitive. I wonder how the whole fight looked like. Machen didn't run like I read...
Let's say that we have different opinions Well, I didn't said nothing about fiirst LaStarza fight or that how Charles and Walcott battered...
And how many fights Moore had at HW? 3 of those fighters are a stretch. Sheppard? Comon... I don't think that mentioning 185 lb Henry and Bivins...
I can't see nothing that a brutal KO.
Can't decide what list is better D.T...Holyfield beat SNV and he should at least in top 5
I would be betting on Big Cat
That says much of that era Thats completly irrevelant. Were Walcott and Charles as good as in the late 40's? No. But still they were good...
That's interesting. I think that Lennox's wins over Holyfield are greater than Marciano's over Walcott and Charles. Rocky defeated them in more...
But this top2 heavy was waaay past prime. Patterson is indeed top 15-20 HW As I said earlier I think that Charles and Walcott were slightly...
Nice perspective. Instead of that we had lousy thrilla in manila, phantom punch, rumble in the jungle, crappy boxing poetry... :D
The question is were they as good as paper says? 50's were exciting era but not that good. Charles and Walcott were wonderful fighters. Moore was...
It's true
This issue can't get out of my head. How to gauge fighters and rank them? I've noticed that if we use some kind of criteria, the results won't be...
