What? No, they weren't.
Right. What was I thinking? :patsch
I actually believe Frazier wins this, probably KO.
In my opinion Walcott's probably the best defensive heavyweight all-time, and he's also one of the greatest counterpunchers in the history of this...
That 39 years old version of Walcott? Yeah, you're probably right.
I don't know exactly which one of them was more of a powerpuncher, but Hagler hit hard.
If Jimmy Young can do it, I tend to believe Walcott can do it too.
That's funny, 'cause as far as I know Chavez had a pretty solid defense, who gets underrated a lot, and great ring IQ. He's also patient and...
You're living in a fantasy world, buddy :good
His uncle had pretty much that same advantage, and look how that turned out. I don't Floyd has the tools to keep Chavez at distance, best case...
De La Hoya and Mayweather are far from having an iron chin, and I don't think Tyson's was that great either. Chuvalo and Chavez are nice picks here.
Chavez would destroy him.
Patterson's 'gazelle punch' fits my criteria of what a telegraphed punch looks like.
I don't think Pernell had a greater jab than Hagler, but that's just me. It's debatable, anyway.
This type of logic would work only if the champion fights only the #1 contender and the best man in the division at that certain time.
