I'am not "hating". Iam simply making a case for one instead of the other. I can easily defend Mayweather's win over Corrales. Iam one of Joe's...
I say Hopkins over Tarver. Tarver was coming off with a win over the very man that beat Hopkins years back. Hopkins was thought of to be done as...
I see what you mean. Even Roy himself told Don King not to put Tito in with Hopkins because he knew Hopkins was going to beat him.
Hatton. Tszyu was still considered dangerous and had never quit before but Hatton made him. Trinidad was coming off a good win over Mayorga but...
True, but generally Trinidad was expected to win so it would set up a big money fight with Roy Jones.
Pac's win over Barrera. I say this because Roy was not the same fighter while Barrera still had plenty of fight in the tank. Barrera went on to...
I would say Jones because history was made that night. He also dominated Ruiz while making a bigger jump in weight that Toney did.
That's why I said you can make a case for both. Mayweather completely dominated Corrales while Calzaghe who was 35 beat the young Kessler.
A lot of this forum picked Kessler if I am not correct.
My bad. I read it wrong.
I know, but there was also only one belt at stake. It was not a unification fight. I think you can make a solid case for both. Also, Joe was 35...
Also, nobody thought that Hopkins would dominate Trinidad the way he did.
Barrera in way (I hate to use this word) "exposed" Hamed for what he truly was. Morales beat a truly great fighter.
You think they really are the best fighters of this decade and the best victories of the decade? If so, they are pretty even though I would lean...
Hopkins-Trinidad is looking back on it. Mosely is surrounded by controversy now because of the recent steroid accusations.
