This is a tough thread, the obvious guy's that stand out are Hopkins, Foreman, and to the lesser extent Duran.. But you have 2 guy's now in...
Holy UD.. Evander was a better boxer , and technician was more experienced, and faced and beat way more talent... The only SLIGHT advantage...
Sweet post! And I agree 100%....
Coetzee was not the best heavy of the 80's but he was more than capable:think Coetzee i thought was robbed against Snipes, bad decision.....
I agree:deal
Ali had way to much heart for Mike, and was a lot smarter too like the previous poster said, Ali all wrong for Mikey:hi: Ali late KO..
Holmes - Tex Cobb Mayweather- Gatti Klitchko-Briggs, Vitali not Wladimir.. Mancini - Duk Koo Kim. Lennox- Tyson:yep
I would go with Holy in the FIRST Bowe fight, he earned a lot of respect, recognition, for giving a guy who outweighed him by 30 lbs a helluva...
Not the type of fight to bet your weekly paycheck on:-( I would take Braxton/ Qawi to win a close decision, in a competitive duel.
:nut, Get real Wlad would beat Kovalev to a pulp.. The only guy with a remote chance of beating Wlad is Wilder but even he would be a live...
I thought his best performance was against Azumah Nelson:deal, great duel to the end, that fight made Nelson better.. Man it was hard to...
:amen, Qawi all the way he has proven himself against better fighters, in 2 or 3 years if Kovalev is still rolling strong, i might be inclined to...
Saad for me he beat better fighters, and he was impossible to discourage, I think Saad wins a close but conclusive decision.
He was the Buster Douglas of the 70's he had a GREAT night and a few good ones, but lacked the Heart to stay on top.. I don't think an ATG,...
Why no rematch :lol:, after being carried from the ring like a rag doll, i seriously doubt Hearns wanted one.. Hagler was just to Big, strong,...
