Troll elsewhere.
He could well have gotten a shot at some point depending on results, obviously.
It's a reasonable win but not one I'd describe as "of real note" which was why i didn't mention it.
I may be misunderstanding you, what was your view seemed hard to follow. Did you think Wlad's historical standing would somehow be changed by this...
Brewsters only win of real note is actually Wlad. He was all but shut out by Etienne and widely outpointed by Shufford. I'm far from convinced...
Either could win this. So much power in the ring.
The thread literally states " If he'd been dropped in to the 1970s?". He is judged on what he did in his own time. He's getting judged by how...
He'd have to get there first, for starters. You said "He beats everyone on his way up in the 70's as well." He was whooped by two guys that...
Ok we will agree to heavily disagree. There's no way he's getting away with that rubbish again and again thru the 70's. The disdain the crowds...
If we had more footage of Holman Williams I'd bet he'd be in there. George Benton was a master of his style and taught some great moves to the...
That's exactly what i am saying, with 15 extra words. Wlad could never be Ali, for a multitude of reasons. Your second paragraph is excellent,...
Do you think Wlad would have Ali's power and reputation, as well as U.S. status? Wlad abused clinching throughout his career. It was a huge part...
He knew full well he tried and was correct on what he was saying. Holmes cops less scrutiny and is more excused than probably every other name...
When you mention "several times" it came of sounding like it's more than one guy. Catch said he never unified, not that he never tried.
On top of this Wlad is going to have to fight a lot more in the U.S. in the 70's and there's no way he gets away with near as much rabid clinching.
