So just to clarify. You don't think a boxer being 40 year olds matters whatsoever. You think a boxer is still in their prime at this age?
Ok? Both Wilder and Joshua have poor resume compare to a lot of ATG... I am not arguing that Wilders is good. There is pros and cons to joshua...
Well it's nonsensical... theres a big difference between a mid 30s guy e.g. 34,35 and a 39 year old.
Foreman hasn't fought in the last 20 years, Wladimir an all time great won one fight at 39, and lost two. Highlights the point well.
Mid 30s? We are talking about a 39 year old man. How many heavyweights in the last 20 years have won belts at that age or older?
Take out Klit an Pov due to both being 40, and shadows of their former selves. None of the other guys are close to being elite. The best of the...
How does it show that age is just a number? He got knocked out because his feet had slowed down significantly by the 4th round, and it was...
He was catching Joshua at ease in the first couple of rounds... a faster, more powerful Povetkin would have KO him. He visibly gassed and started...
His two best names had a combined age of 80 years old... all his other wins have been against European level opposition at best. All this whilst...
Povetkin is an old man and off the PEDS... he lacks the stamina, reflexes and power he had in his younger days. He was never going to win this...
Of course Wilder would have ko him. It would have been a similar fights, Povetkin looks good for 2-3 rounds, but then due to age starts slowing...
Povetkin too old, was always going to slow down and get caught if he didn't ko in the first few rounds. But lacks the power post peds.
I will take the drug addict who is trying to turn his career around, over the drug dealer.
Flopping does't mean anything, people in every sport flop if it can gain them a competitive advantage. It doesn't mean a person isn't tough, I see...
I would like to see Joshua be brutally ko, bring a bit more parity back to the division and it might actually humble him a bit, but I doubt it.
