Could you please highlight the part of my post where I said that?
Cheers, JT (again).
Cheers, JT.
Was that early 85 after Page had beaten Coetzee? Would you agree Holmes didn't miss anyone during his prime (lets say up to the Witherspoon...
I've just checked using AI, Shavers and Cooney were broadly joint the most favoured by fight time, in the betting market, of all Holmes defences....
Can't agree with what, exactly? I've said fighting poor opposition when past prime doesn't detract from a fighter's greatness, it just doesn't...
It depends what the discussion is about. Morality or historical standing. I'm not interested in the morality discussion, but for whatever ever...
I understand your points and, without going on a tangent and debating the respective merits of the claims of each contender you list, as a...
Ah, when you said Holmes had 5 x Valdes (revised to 4 in your above post), you meant number of nr. 1 contenders not defended against during his...
Referring back to McGrain's top 100 HW list, Holmes missed 1 x fighter from that list who was active during his prime and title reign,...
I'm unsure if its in a thread still available on this site, but it is present, and discussed, over a series of posts, here -...
My all time HW list only goes down to 25, mate. It is different to Matt's, but, in the main, there is not much, if anything, wildly different....
This is where HWs active on the world scene from the beginning of Holmes prime in 78, to when he lost his title to Spinks, rank in McGrain's top...
Agreed. Kirkman just edges out Chuck Wepner, imo.
Wlad was yet to refine his strategic approach and even a past prime, out of shape Lewis would be favoured to match the results achieved by Sanders...
