i wouldn't say it's "human nature", but some people just can't take their emotions/allegiances out of the equation and be impartial.
you're a shocker, you really are.
but you're not alone on this forum.
good like picking the weight class for this one
i knew it wasn't a "gotcha" moment, but froch was no god at SMW.
he was very good though.
post of the day (for yesterday).
andre ward and mikkel kessler said to say 'hello'
golovkin fought a prime canelo...twice.
who did calzaghe fight in their prime?
froch was never on the level of ward or calzaghe.
he is on kessler's level, one rung below, but daylight between these two levels of fighter.
the best fighter calzaghe beat who was in his prime was kessler.
you didn't answer the question.
he concealed that he's actually mexican.
explains a lot.
and that's exactly why i never see you getting emotionally invested in the achievements of others, which shadow clearly can't do.
it's a credit to...
if people can't remove their emotional attachment to a fighter simply because you come from the same pile of dirt that they do, then it has...
ever seen the movie "groundhog day"?
are you mexican?
looking at this post, seeing how hard you're trying to say floyd didn't dominate canelo in the other thread, and refusing to say...
who was the best fighter calzaghe beat who was in his prime?
you're doing it again.
"...which is the basis for the idea that floyd dominated".
no it isn't.
pac fight should have happened earlier, we all know that.
who's fault that was is dependent on who you ask.
but the canelo fight happened during...
no, you're giving your point of view and i'm giving mine. we don't agree.
this isn't a court case where you "provide photographic evidence". we've...
in the debate i'm having with you in another thread you say that floyd is "a great fighter", but this post gives me insight into what you really...
you need to apply the judgment you made to my POV in the first sentence, and realise it also applies to yours.
...which is why the first sentence of my post that you just replied to opened with, "that just means we see the fight differently".
i've already stated previously a couple of times (a month or two ago) that i watch all my fights for free down the local pub.
the corruption is crystal clear, but you forget when people acknowledge this because you're in a never-ending loop that keeps leading you back to...
link any of my posts where i said he didn't, or "refused to believe he'd cheat".
i don't idolize anyone, it's just your kneejerk reaction whenever...