i really don't agree with this kind of logic, its kind of a chain thing but the lowest part of the chain could have beaten the highest part of the...
look at the post that i quoted..he stated that tarver was not a name unless you missed that. You know mr. T and ivan drago so that means tarver is...
-bronze medal -starred in the recent Rocky film -beat jones twice! TWICE -reggie johnson -eric harding -montell griffin -glen johnson -clinton...
i wouldn't say so..perhaps like williams he would learn from his mistakes and adjust in a rematch..perhaps he has a slim chance of winning but...
umm...why don't just get a rematch with williams? I mean sure williams iced him in the 1st round but he still deserves a rematch if i'm right.
the americans are on a winning streak against fighters from the U.K, championship caliber fights of course.. floyd-hatton luevano-cook...
why does everytime a fighter from the US wins against a fighter from the UK, threads like these pop up:huh
dzinziruk is unknown although i agree the guy got skills but i rank him in the same level as alcime in 154. I say spinks is the guy at the top...
why make threads on fights that have 0 possibility of happening:huh
DLH 117-111 even in this past prime version
juanma>DPDL>bautista now now where do we put concepcion? certainly not above juanma and DPDL so i say juanma>DPDL>bautista=concepcion(tied):D
what kind of poll is this? stupid poll, i'm not a yank but i voted no
he could move up to 130 and would still be competitive
what is a 36 yr old compared to a 43 yr old:rofl dawson is better than pavlik in terms of boxing ability, it should be dawson he would fight
its all part of the hype..but i think dawson would be more difficult for joe
