hearns, duran at 135, and SRL
seeing as you were with them personally i'll take your word:good
imo 115 is better. lets not forget a lot of fighters at 135 and 175 will be retiring soon(calzaghe, casa, etc.)
great and solid list, the only thing i disagree was with winky:good
i see..i was just wondering why these said fighters hold both titles at some time of their career
divac can you tell me your p4p list? or who is #1 because i am trying to imagine myself in your situation and i find it damn hard to give it to...
pavlik is in his prime right now i think 160-175 or perhaps up to cruiserweight
that list is pure bull****. To have hearns at 66 is fair enough not to buy such a stupid ring list
galaxy is way too high, he may be thailand's greatest boxer but his resume is just too weak to be considered that high.. Its even worse than...
not really, he is after all top 10 ATG on a lot of peoples list..i think pac has a chance but pep is the choice to go not totally underestimating...
when did he say pac is cherry picking? read his post...you sound like pacdbest
it all depends what division it is..it is quite easy to unify this days in such weak divisions like 154 and 130(with the elite fighters moving up)...
iran barkley cames to mind
tarver is ibo, ibf champ donaire is ibo ibf champ klitscho is ibf ibo champ balloyi used to be ibo ibf champ hatton used to be ibf ibo champ...
are they sister organizations?
