he's scared that johnson will hug him for 12 rounds like hopkins. why would calzaghe be scared of someone who has lost 12 times?
Warren makes my blood boil. can't stand the man and his shitty bias column. what did joes earn for the hopkins fight btw?
maybe it would be better if you just ignored them
i just dont get why he let bernard clinch continuosly though (saying nothing about it) but he was calling break before floyd and hatton had even...
something that still amazes me to this day is the difference in joe cortez refereeing style between the hatton - mayweather fight and the hopkins...
http://sports.setanta.com/en/Sport/News/Other-sports/2008/11/16/Boxing-Vitali-on-Lewis/?facets/great-britain-locale/sport-space/boxing/ vitali...
i'm a big hatton fan but yes PBF schooled him, though the refereeing was nothing short of a disgrace from cortez.
what your resume includes people who kicked his ass (jones, taylor) :lol: howard eastman :shock: , glen johnson who has lost 12 times :nut...
its wierd, all calzaghe can do is slap, yet hopkins had the help of a bias ref, had to hold all night, faigned low blows, and still couldn't beat...
loved hagler v leonard round 9 round 11 in eubank v watson 2 was bonkers
he could have stopped jones with a number of unanswered punches if he wanted too (not through ko) but he chose to let roy get through the last 3...
think realistically speaking, chad dawson in cardiff is the most realistic match up. the question is 'how much does joe want this?' he says he...
roy should go to cardiff and fight tom jones
i agree to a degree, that joe owes johnson a shot - do you think this would be viewed as a credible opponent?
i agree about the debate thing mate, just wanted your view cos i was too idle to write anything else. the eubank win was a very good win imo....
