I think that people get too much of a hang-up about the Top 10. After all, 10 is a fairly arbitrary number. Why not Top 12? Or Top 7? People, get...
Forgive me, I should have made myself explicit. I don't doubt that reputable organisations, like The Ring, have/ had him ranked in the Top 10....
True warrior for his brave never-say-die performance against Pacquiao, for example. I don't believe he loaded his gloves or attempted to do...
Both were prospects. Prospects don't count. They aren't at all proven.
He does. I love Margarito. A TRUE warrior. There's very few as brave in boxing. I think he would give Martinez a hard fight but I think Martinez...
:yep Not sure how good the guy is these days, but if he is as good as at his peak, he will not be an easy fight for Ward.
My pleasure!:p
A = Elite = regularly putting in elite level performances, the kind of performances that would make one at least competitive against all-time...
He was NOT elite. And he was not a top 10 p4per. :good
The WBC Crook in Chief and now Dave "Dogdy" Parris! It's turning into a good year!:happy:happy:happy
I wish Bute all the best.:good For me, A level guys are Pacquiao and Mayweather because they regularly put in the highest level of performance...
I like Manny's more because there was no chance at all he could miss. Martinez had missed a few times with that punch previously.
1. Manny 2. Mayweather 3/4 Sergio/Wlad ...it's debatable after that... :good
Yeah... good call. That would be a very good fight and would sell.
Pavlik wasn't p4p Top 15, nevermind top 5 when he fought him! (Which list are you using?)
