i honestly believe any heavyweight in history who stepped in the ring with ali that nite woulda been beat. his speed and movement was in a class...
easy to hit if you have the reach to do so, other wise you gotta get inclose past those monster arms. lyle was the first fight foreman had in 15...
the reach difference troubles me more. ali could hit foreman easier cuz of his extra reach. marciano is gonna take bombs to get in close to foreman.
marciano's style is all wrong for foreman unless he's gonna dance and stay away for 3 rounds or the only other option which no one but ali woulda...
easy peasy. walcott rated ali as the best heavy he ever seen and who should question his opinion. he fought the other greats. a 65 to 67 ali could...
joe frazier let ali win. the people knew ali was playing and winding frazier up with uncle tom but he believed it to be true. frazier shoulda...
wow saad muhammad left uppercut was some punch :) great stuff
ali woulda been a lot better in 1969 (27 years old) than the version frazier faced so it works both ways.
walcott against the ropes and leaving himself wide open. i'm surprised many don't comment about the big mistake that he made. paid big time for...
frazier woulda been fighting a better conditioned ali so he wouldn't tire as easily as the comeback version (timing, reflexes, experience etc...
lyle could trade against foreman and shavers so i think his power was better than average LOL unless they were not big punchers. actually that is...
1. Ali 2. Louis 3. Holmes 4. Foreman 5. Johnson 6. Frazier 7. Dempsey 8. Lewis 9. Tyson 10. Liston 11. Marciano 12. Holyfield 13....
ali would beat them all. louis was too slow on his feet. i'd make fighters quicker on their feet more chance of beating ali than louis. no way ali...
hey not many could go toe to toe and slug with shavers and win. you think ali and holmes fought him like that LOL. last thing you wanna do is...
can you post that dempsey article? thanks.
