The iron chinned Jeffries could survive Liston's punches. Not sure Liston could handle Jeff's blows. If they can handle each other's punches and...
No, Douglas is not underrated. If anything, he is overrated. A solid fighter, good enough to be in the top ten, who happened to get into great...
Let's not get carried away. He's a very good fighter, no doubt, but he's nowhere near the best at 154. I would still pick Sergio Martinez and Paul...
I like to see the respect that Bowe is receiving here. He deserves it. That said, I still think Clay outpoints him. Bowe was too stationary, not...
I hear you, and it's sad. It's almost as if they TRY to put on the worst fights they can and to drive the fans away. Not sure what the logic is...
I would love to be HBO's matchmaker. I would not air any fight unless it featured two guys who didn't run, didn't grab, liked to land meaningful...
Bradley totally deserved it. He displayed the gamer qualities, landed the harder crisper blows with bad intent on them, while Alexander seemed...
Tyson would not even need to catch Roy cleanly to KO him. Simply not a fair match for Roy, who was too light in the ass to deal with that type of...
Mosley wins because he's too fast, has too good a defense, chin, and generalship for Corrales. Diego would make it fun while it lasted because...
Any version of Tyson that is remotely motivated and in proper shape KOs Douglas. BD looked great because Tyson allowed him to do so by showing up...
Foreman vs. the five wasn't a hoax, believe me, it was no easy task for George. Ali - Liston II will be forever debated.
Ali would beat Foreman every day of the week. Too much speed, skill, relaxation, defense, chin, condition, experience. A rematch would likely have...
Billy Woods was just Jeff's sparring partner, and on 4-28-97, they gave a 6-round exhibition bout, offering their best rendition of the...
Disagree. I think Gene Fullmer was Robinson's toughest opponent.
I'm working on a book right now on Tommy Burns, and I'll offer you up something Burns said in March 1907. This is in 1907, mind you: Burns said...