the video is good quality and a lot of work went into it but the bias is too strong and this video is extremely redundant. there are already a...
Its subjective. I have Pacquiao above Mayweather; Mayweather just does not fight often enough.
This michigan fella has issues. :roll:
Did the raise his hands *** **** Khan stole, cost him the fight? Um...what?
Glad you got to go! And yes I agree, WIlliams and Malignaggi are both very nice and personable. Great representatives of the sport.
....Who? :think
I am surprised there is no mention of Mayweather-Spadafora in here. *edit: Ha one minute late I guess.
Thats a negative.
True but he also was not landing nearly the shots that he did in the first fight. And Cotto looked just as bad after the Pacquiao fight without...
I dont think you can really use this fight as an argument about the plaster. Margo didn't land nearly the type of punches he landed in the first...
lol the hate in this thread. Put away your bias and vote for Pacquiao to give boxing more attention (unless you really want someone else to win)....
Its a shame the fight did not happen after Pacquiao beat Cotto, it would have been an amazing fight.
I gave the fight to Pacquiao but it was a very close fight. No robbery either way.
Hmmm I think you have the fighters confused :huh. Almost everything you said should be reversed.
Nonsense. The Frazier of 71 beats both Klit brothers.
