Dempsey's opposition was not ****. He beat some decent fighters, he had some good wins.
Tyson v Bonecrusher Smith.
Amazing stamina from Dempsey. Look how he's galloping around high up on his toes for a full 15 rounds. In the midday sun as well.
No, because Charles won the first two fights quite clearly. Walcott was lucky to be given a 3rd chance.
Mine is another vote for Hatton
i understand that too well. That's why i don't see the need for all the elaborate explanations and excuse for the Buster Douglas defeat. That's...
true, and many of those fighters just weren't very good This is true. I don't believe the hype about Ali being "untouchable" either. But he...
He didn't remain fundamentally sound, and I agree with guyfawkes - Tyson got his feet muddled, it wasn't on purpose. Yes, he was balanced to throw...
well, that's why they say judging scoring is subjective. All I said is that the rounds could go either way. I don't think you're wrong. I don't...
who cares about the scoring. those rounds were quite uneventful and arguably they could go either way. It's really nothing to get upset about....
Looked like he was going all out to KO Thomas in the first. The doctor famously stuck his nose into the Thomas corner to check Thomas was okay....
I don't see him as that well balanced, he is often pushed back and sometimes does a half-stumble to the side. His feet just sort of follow what...
:lol:
No, he won three rounds at most. Look at the 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds. I don't care if you give them all to Tyson, you will see that they are...
:lol: Yeah, which kind of evens it out. we end up having no choice but to score punches land.
