My gut feeling is to go for a Groves win on points. I think they're evenly matched - in that Groves is better technically but Froch has better...
Yeah, Groves was hurt, but he was still covering up, he was still trying to fight back and he wasn't defenceless and hadn't even been knocked off...
I think Froch had his head up his own arse again and was believing his own hype too much. It's alright talking crap and running down an opponent...
That's not widely accepted at all. If it was there wouldn't have been such a outcry in favor of a rematch and the IBF wouldn't have ordered one....
Johnson is a lazy ultra-defensive boxer. Chisora will out-work him to a UD.
...then why are you commenting on a thread about them agreeing to have a rematch?
No, its one of the most important fights for Froch's legacy. Froch/Groves 1 was the most controversial finish in any fight he's ever had, and many...
Ok, I can see the reason why Froch as Champion would get 85% of the purse against a mandatory ranked outside of the top 3 in the IBF Rankings -...
Lewis would have fought Ruiz if Ruiz and King had waited until after he fought Grant. Everybody wanted to see Lewis/Grant, practically nobody...
I'm sure Hamed would think that considering he quit after his first loss and a lackluster comeback, but Froch has proven to have more longevity...
He's fighting Arreola for the title sometime in the future.
Totally undeserving of a WBC Title shot. Both of them. Wilder's bum-killer extraordiare who has yet to face a live body and Scott's beaten no one...
Why are you trying to turn this into a thread about Calzaghe? God knows there are more than enough of them on this forum as it is.
Have you never heard of the term "exaggeration for effect"? Froch was second best throughout the Taylor fight and only got into it as Taylor...
His worst performance was Taylor, his worst fight was Dirrell. Taylor because he was getting his arse handed to him for the entire fight then got...
