At 156? I agree.
Yep, I think cotto would be up on points but he's just too small to take lemieuxs shots and eventually would be forced into submission. Accuse me...
How did you get that from my post? :lol: he's far better skill wise than lemieux, that's obvious. Lemieux just wouldn't be bothered by cottos...
At 160? No. Lemieux would bludgeon cotto into submission, he'd walk through everything cotto has and eventually prove to be too big and too strong.
So who should GGG fight in his division then?
Even if this were true, why would you celebrate it, so weird :lol: Unless you don't want cotto or canelo to fight GGG?
Lol what? I'm a huge GGG fan and he should definitely have had a point deducted and had lemieux genuinely not been able to continue then of...
Anyone backing up against lemieux for any good length of time is in trouble. I'd say lemieux takes this by KO but you can never rule andy lee out.
Geale isn't his best win, and GGG may have actually killed the zombie shell of geale that cotto dragged into the ring.
Unfortunately this was the original, hans thread was the retaliation thread. This would have been understandable if it was retaliation but this is...
Murray, lemieux, geale, macklin, all pretty decent IMO. Who in his weight class is not a bum? Or do you not want to compromise your position...
Right so he has effective footwork, and if you could elaborate on how exactly GGG is a bum that would be great.
So how exactly does he manage to trap all his opponents in the corners and on the ropes then, because it can't be his footwork can it?
Come on man you can be a good poster, stop with the double standards. There are videos of him being knocked out in the amateurs and he's been...
Think this is going to be close either way on the cards, I highly doubt either of them is going to take a "beating"
