Yes, I agree. It gets tiring, how one man is seen as so superior to all others that they only way he could lose would be because of a long litany...
Same old craziness. And yet we are powerless to stop it. This is what is so frustrating about being a boxing fan....all you can do is take it.
It was a bit of both. Foreman is a physical marvel and he did prove that he could hang in there with the best, at an advanced age. Not many...
Who would you take in this fight, prime for prime? I am picking Valuev by decision.
Nice one.
Thompson keeping his shirt on for weigh in is not a good sign.
Wepner would have one advantage: size. Chuck would dwarf Jerry. But it wouldn't matter. Wepner would be competitive for a few rounds, but his...
Even when old, George could cut the ring off pretty well. He'd catch Roy at some point. There's no way Roy could survive the physicality of Foreman.
Morrison has the ability to outbox him, but I too would favor Bonecrusher by KO. Smith was in his early thirties when he fought Tyson. Many of...
Tommy has speed and power. Smith has power and chin. Who do you like over twelve?
Never liked his personality, but I really do respect Sugar Ray Leonard, who was probably the all-around best that I've seen in my life.
Foreman's terrible strategy in Zaire.
Yes, he is among the worst. Holmes had the ability to beat anyone in history, but he really milked his title reign and had no pride whatsoever...
Cobb was not a tomato can, not by a long shot. He was a tough, durable journeyman who actually ended his career with a long winning streak....
It's obscene that these guys never fought in the pros. I blame them both. We wouldn't be having these debates if they'd gotten in the ring together.
