well, I don't see anything wrong with this:...
Knocked out by both, a younger version of Ortiz would not let him escape the seventh as well.
That doesn't really matter, he failed the test after the hammer fight (the fight before Klitschko), so he should have been banned by then. Not to...
hmm I think shadow111 might be boxed ears magnum opus..
Actually it was, he shouldn't have had a licence in november 2015.
But we have to start somewhere and hope it has a positive effect on america and everywhere else (excluding Las Vegas, I think that ship has sailed :))
No, it just shows how corrupt boxing obviously is. Every case should be treated the same.
He broke the rules, so he should be punished accordingly. The fact that others did the same and got away with it has no bearings on Furys ruling.
So you guys don't see any problem here? :D Ukad is lucky that Parker won the Hughie fight, or their ruling would have taken another two years...
That's exactly what happened. British Sport wants to keep the world title win. The Hammer fight got overturned, but he get's to keep the Klitschko...
It's pretty obvious what they are doing here. The Hammer and Klitschko fights should be overturned.
They probably saw "a drunken punchup at a wedding".. ;)
What a career, had to become 41 to make it competitive for the rest. Happy retirement Champ!!
I wouldn't want to pay for a rigged fight either... I think the idea that controversy creates profitable rematches should be off the table now.
I'd really like to know what the IBF plans to do about this, it's in their best interest to protect their champion and not have their title become...
