Why wouldn't they be mentioned? They are two of the key reasons why Hearns would beat your hero.
You are clueless. Mayweather was backed up and cornered by Maidana and Castillo. Mayweather often went back in straight lines. Mayweather...
Meh, he's pretty ordinary. Nothing overly special.
Were they different defensively? Yes. Was Mayweather superior defensively to Benitez? Not really, yet Hearns was able to easily outpoint Benitez...
Leonard's KO percentage is higher.
I am sure you watched both men throughout their careers. You just don't understand what you were watching.
Strawman argument.
He wasn't invincible. He had weaknesses. Mayweather just doesn't have the required skills to exploit those weaknesses. Read what others have...
Mayweather wouldn't have the power to stop Hearns late on anyway. Even if Hearns tired.
"I don't like Floyd Mayweather but he is the greatest person to have ever lived"
A few tips. - Any poster who dislikes Mayweather is a hater who knows nothing about boxing. - Pac and ODH should be mocked when others compare...
Neither is Floyd Mayweather.
Zulu and Gazelle Punch are already using this gimmick.
I agree. You and the other bozo need to take off the pro-Mayweather tinted specs.
I genuinely think some in this thread would give Mayweather a chance against a prime Lennox Lewis.
