For a second there I thought Id read not being a good puncher....:lol: I need new eyes!
Isnt Sturm form a decade before him?
Jimmy Wilde, Ken Buchanan, George Feeney cause he lasted the distance with Boom Boom. I dont know if they were necessarily respected by everyone...
If it goes and has a structure with champions and challengers, then there is not much I can do but accept it. But so far Ive never even seen a...
Monzon easily...
Pat Duran seemed good at first but his management was poor..first being fed no hoppers and then straight to the contenders...there was no steps up...
Alex Ramos, Earl Hargrove, Juan Antonio Lopez, Miguel Montilla, John Mugabi and Mustafa Hamsho come to mind and also Frank Bruno. But I have to...
He was being sarcastic..I hope
Indeed, amigo, indeed
Indeed but I was a big fan..my eyes were blind to the fact LOL
Out of all those, Id say record-wise at least, it had to be De La Hoya..he was something like 39-6? Of course, records dont always tell the whole...
Well, Jimmy Wilde, Ricardo Lopez, Miguel Canto, for an old man Ivan Calderon, Eder Jofre, Fighting Harada, Wilfredo Gomez, Willie Pep, Salvador...
But he got up and beat Kelly..and he beat Medina and was winning that fight widely.
So??
I agree about Michalczewski but disagree about Hill. Hill definitely deserves to be in he was a long-time champion. Im also torn about Fabrice...
