highly. i'm not the guy to care if he's number 4 or 10 all time. gans was tough, smart, had good technique and was physically top tier. what...
gotta pick inoue.
33-2 with one of the losses being to ward. borderline, i'd say yes if i had to choose yes/no.
fury.
i don't think it is. i think people see how great he looked and then expect a bit more from his resume.
he fought stupid. his performance would still have beaten most people.
no.
i think kalambay might have the best chance. he might well got blown out but if he doesn't he can win rounds and make hagler think twice. the...
lamotta was a lot better and a bit bigger.
the speed/size difference would make it very one sided.
it's always gotta be a mixture of record and who did they beat, with context. lopez was a good example of someone i'd consider a great fighter...
not the best version of larry but i think he has a style/size advantage. would like to see it.
makes me feel dirty to pick carnera so i won't. hard to pick foster either tho.
same as armstrong (but a bit less) he wasn't headbutting people but his head was in the right place for contact.
i think the same, jones toney is a good win, just not what it should have been.
