the point that chris would never be in position to get hit like that is fair. even if he was, i'd take his chin, maybe he'd be so f'd he'd lose...
charles is an easy pick. the other two would hit him a lot but i wouldn't write him off completely in those fights.
by random chance the referee doesn't see the low blow that puts evan down for 10.
is it pure defence or how they use defence skills in their boxing? if hitting the other guy is irrelevant then locche 4 sure.
rules?
florida marlins
atg numbers are a bit pointless. i liked mcgrains tier thing. arguello is the third tier, so like 30-60 all time for me.
that's how i talk, everyone's cool. has anyone else given a sensible way conn could win?
moore was better in rematches, this is the first fight.
he mostly stays outside and punches archie in the face really hard?
i guess jones toney looks similar. roy jones was not amir khan. obviously archie could ko any man in his division, would he get that chance in 1...
why is suggesting the best strategy for the underdog some crazy thing where u need to talk to me like i'm some **** who said something stupid?
same, liakhovich was very tough but basic. smith was a bit less and a lot more.
pep had decent size thighs and core, i think fw was good for him.
yeah, that one. that two?
