That's one way of looking at it. But based on this Holmes' era, Louis' era and Wlad's era would be considered strong and they usually aren't.
Until you don't have a proper sample on how Ngannou would fair against other heavyweights from the era, you can't blame the era for Fury wetting...
If these are all facts, show me these dodgy canvases and glove clauses in contracts ;)
So? It doesn't change the fact that Wlad reigned from 2006 to 2015 and Vitali was was only active from 2008 to 2012. You were the one claiming...
What the fact that he was winning in Germany has to do with anything? Who were these old opponents you are referring to? Short? So you're...
Every long reigning champion has soft touches on his resume. What matters is, Wlad cleaned out every top contender there was in his era. Fury...
Hell no. They are not worthy of carrying Wlad's jockstrap when it comes to being champions.
Or it just speaks volumes about him/his performance, since a Top 3 guy of that era blasted that guy out in 2.
What is it that makes an era great? Sometimes it seems like the only "strong" eras in the history of the heavyweight boxing are 70s and 90s. All...
Lennox Lewis.
Still, Fury was way more overhyped for his Wilder win. So it's irrelevant. Martin, Dubois and Wilder were paper champions, sure. AJ in some sense...
I love Thomas, but I think Fury's size and skill would win him the decision.
I wonder if Ali gets the same treatment if he doesn't become 3x lineal champion. It really boosted his legacy in the eyes of the people back then.
Too early for Itauma imo.
Yeah. Plus it took like 17 flush punches to put him down.
